The Dark Side of Fluoridization

After reading you won’t use those products again… 

Fluoride – Facts and thoughts about the dark side of Fluoridization of mankind

Fluoride once used as rat poison is a highly dangerous substance that is used to target humans and cause them health issues. One of its main targets (of Fluidization) is to calcify the pineal gland and block you from connecting yourself to the source and free yourself from the Draco-alliance matrix. 

Ancient traditions knew of the pineal and enshrouded its mysteries in their lore. They knew that the pineal plays a role in our spiritual development and communication with spiritual beings. But with an increasingly toxic world, many people do not know of the innate gifts inherent to an open pineal.

If a pregnant woman is using fluoride (even in a small dose) her newborn child is more likely to have an IQ drop of 2.4 for every gram of Fluoride. That fact alone is scary, but what about small kids who use toothpaste with fluoride? 

Do they complain about stomach aches? 

In Toothpaste, there is enough quantity to kill a small child!!! 

New studies cast doubts on fluoridation benefits. Such an article was published on May 8, 1989, by Bette Hillman. 

“An analysis of natural survey data collected by the National Institute of Dental Research (NIDR) concludes that children who live in areas of the US where the water supplies are fluoridated have tooth decay rates nearly identical with those who live in non-fluoridated areas.” 

There has never been a controlled, randomized trial to demonstrate the effectiveness or safety of fluoridation, despite over 60 years of consumption in public water supplies. A group of non-profit organizations is now fighting this practice, citing a mountain of evidence that shows little benefit, and massive risks.


[See what Dr. Grant Layton, DDS. has to say about the dangers of fluoride] 

[Check out this wonderful video from about The Actual Truth About Fluoride]  


It also interferes with the healthy function of the glands inside your body, it disrupts the Growth hormone and the list goes on and on and on… Did you really believe the pharma cartel in promoting this kind of shit? 

Stop being a Yes! Man for everything, any authority farts in the wind… Think, doubt, and change the way you live. 


Again, I will say this – Small children taking toothpaste with fluoride can suffer from stomach aches because it is mixed with Hydrochloride inside your stomach. 


There is no single respected research that states a benefit of Fluoride, and I will say more than the last statement – you won’t find any research that gives more benefits on using fluoride. 


More “benefits” are: 

* Damages the brain cells 

* Damages Bones & Teeth

* Causing Thyroid dysfunction

* Calcify the Pineal Gland and blocks your 3rd eye 


From what sources you can get this shit? Sprayed chemicals on poor soil, water supply, foods, GMO foods, cosmetics, and more. 


Want to read more?  Want to read the resources for these outrageous claims? Click this link here and read it on 


Fluoride is added to 70% of America’s drinking water, in what has long been a controversial practice of involuntary mass medication.
The CDC lists fluoridation as one of the top 10 most important public health measures of the 20th century. But a group of non-profit organizations is now fighting the EPA on this practice, citing a mountain of evidence that shows little benefit, and massive risks.

Not only has the ingestion of fluoride been linked to a variety of health concerns, but research increasingly shows that it doesn’t even improve our teeth. While applying fluoride directly to the tooth’s enamel can, in fact, prevent tooth decay, it has been proven in dozens of peer-reviewed studies that swallowing the substance has no health benefit whatsoever.


So, why exactly do we fluoridate our water?

The origin of the practice is downright bizarre: In 1901, dentist Frederick McKay began a 30-year study of what was known as “The Colorado Brown Stain.” Residents of Colorado Springs showed a unique disfiguration of their teeth: brown, mottled pits appeared in this population with alarming consistency; yet, as McKay would soon discover, there was a beneficial trade-off for this unsightly condition: Those afflicted by the “Brown Stain” showed a complete lack of tooth decay and cavities.

After an analysis of the local water supplies, McKay found an unusually high amount of fluoride; which he credited for both the lack of decay and the “Brown Stain.” Today, the “Brown Stain” is known as dental fluorosis, and mild cases (which only produce white streaks) are present in 58% of adolescents. This mild discoloration has been a known side effect of fluoridation since the beginning, but the benefit of cavity and decay reduction was thought to outweigh the risk.

In the last few decades, however, an abundance of medical research has emerged that shows much more profound potential dangers, leading to an ongoing legal battle to end this practice. Fluoride is essentially toxic to the human body, although in small doses, no acute effects are perceived. While our kidneys can filter out 50-60% of the fluoride we consume, the rest is stored in the body and has been observed to build up over time in certain areas.

One organ that is particularly susceptible to fluoride build-up is the pineal gland; the part of our brain responsible for regulating sleep and reproductive hormones. Sometimes known as “the third eye,” this small gland has been linked to metaphysical abilities by many cultures throughout history. Philosopher and scientist René Descartes believed the pineal gland to be the “principal seat of the soul.”

It is estimated that 40% of Americans have significant amounts of fluoride build-up in this gland by age 17. By old age, the pineal gland contains about the same amount of fluoride as a tooth. While the role of the pineal gland in facilitating psychic abilities and increased intuition is still up for debate, the fact that fluoride consumption impacts the gland’s ability to function is absolutely proven.

And that’s not the only part of the brain that suffers: over 30 independent studies have linked fluoride to a reduction in childhood IQ: A 2018 study published in Occupational & Environmental Medicine found that, for every increase of 1 milligram per liter of fluoride in a pregnant women’s urine, their offspring averaged 2.4 points lower IQ scores at age 1-3 years old. This follows a 2017 study funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) showing in Otero fluoride levels are associated with lower IQ in 6–12-year-olds.

Animal studies have shown other neurological effects, including impaired memory, reduced ability to learn, and even mild forms of brain damage. With potential health risks like that, you would think that the evidence of fluoride’s benefits must be pretty solid. …. well, think again.

There is no solid proof that drinking fluoride actually improves dental health.

In a 1989 study, data collected by the National Institute of Dental Research found that children who live in areas where the water supplies are fluoridated have tooth decay rates nearly identical to those who live in non-fluoridated areas. While tooth decay has declined in the US since fluoridation was introduced, countries that do not add fluoride to their water have seen the same rate of decline in tooth decay. This data from the World Health Organization implies that factors apart from fluoridated water are contributing to the overall improvement of dental health worldwide.

In fact, there has never been a controlled, randomized trial to demonstrate the effectiveness or safety of fluoridation, despite over 60 years of consumption in public water supplies. A 2009 study, funded by the NIH, was surprisingly the first to look at individual exposure to fluoride (rather than simply living in a fluoridated community). They found no correlation whatsoever between fluoride ingestion and tooth decay.

Considering the wealth of scientific evidence now available, the involuntary mass consumption of fluoride seems indefensible. Yet, the EPA has dismissed citizen petitions to remove the substance and is now trying to dismiss a lawsuit that would ban the use of fluoride under the Toxic Substances Control Act. 

Carbon filtration devices, like those made by PUR or Brita, will not remove fluoride from water. Even expensive reverse-osmosis filters cannot remove 100% of the substance, although they can be up to 90% effective. Even if you have your own well or collect rainwater to drink, fluoride is still practically impossible to avoid. Food and drink are often made with fluoridated water. And of course, no explicit labeling is required.

When most people hear the term fluoride, they think of happy, white, shiny teeth. But if more Americans looked at the actual truth about this practice, perhaps the involuntary medication could end.


Stay healthy, and treat your body with respect. 

Richard Lionheart



Want to read more about this?

Our Partners

Join The Community Forum


Richard Lionheart

Richard Lionheart

Author, Entrepreneur, EpiConsciousness Strategist

One Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Your Cart
    Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop